Causal Representation and Behavior: The Integration of Mechanism and Covariation
نویسندگان
چکیده
Causal knowledge can be based on acquired information about the statistical relationship (covariation) between a cause and effect or on knowledge of the mechanism by which causal power is transmitted between the cause and effect. A key issue is the functional significance of this distinction. In this article, we review recent research in which the influence of covariational evidence on prior beliefs was analyzed. We argue that the way in which covariation influences prior beliefs is independent of whether those beliefs are based on covariation or mechanism information, and that convincing demonstrations of the dissociability of the two types of causal knowledge have not been obtained. We argue that although there are several ways in which causal knowledge can be acquired, that knowledge shares a common representational basis.
منابع مشابه
Explanations and Causal Judgments are Differentially Sensitive to Covariation and Mechanism Information
We report four experiments demonstrating that judgments of explanatory goodness are sensitive both to covariation evidence and to mechanism information. Compared to judgments of causal strength, explanatory judgments tend to be more sensitive to mechanism and less sensitive to covariation. Judgments of understanding tracked covariation least closely. We discuss implications of our findings for ...
متن کاملThe Gains of Economic Integration: Substantive Evidence for an Australia-Korea Free Trade Agreement
Abstract On 6 December 2006, Australia and Korea announced a joint study on a possible Australia-Korea free trade agreement (AKFTA) to promote trade and economic relations between the two countries. The paper provides empirical evidence on the possible gains and their transmission mechanism from this agreement. Significantly, it uses a new economic policy modelling approach, the endogenous grav...
متن کاملDistinguishing genuine from spurious causes: a coherence hypothesis.
Two opposing views have been proposed to explain how people distinguish genuine causes from spurious ones: the power view and the covariational view. This paper notes two phenomena that challenge both views. First, even when 1) there is no innate specific causal knowledge about a regularity (so that the power view does not apply) and 2) covariation cannot be computed while controlling for alter...
متن کاملCovariation in natural causal induction.
The covariation component of everyday causal inference has been depicted, in both cognitive and social psychology as well as in philosophy, as heterogeneous and prone to biases. The models and biases discussed in these domains are analyzed with respect to focal sets: contextually determined sets of events over which covariation is computed. Moreover, these models are compared to our probabilist...
متن کاملInterpreting Covariation in Causal Structure Learning
Recent studies have shown that people use covariation information to infer causal structure. However, there is little information about how people derive causal directionality from covariation. The present study is designed to provide further evidence about the role of covariation in causal structure learning. In Experiment 1, where covariation between two variables was systematically manipulat...
متن کامل